StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SAGA.OL$1.47+2.80%
Fair $1.47+0.0%

SAGA.OL

Saga Pure ASA

Financial Services / Asset ManagementOslo

$1.47

+0.04 (+2.80%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1.47Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 44/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SAGA.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Saga Pure ASA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$992M

P/E

147.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

49.8x

↑

ROE

0.7%

↓

Gross Margin

35.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1
$1$2

TradingView lightweight chart

SAGA.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1.470Periodo -86.4%
Fair value: $1.470

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

+303.2%

FCF margin

1749.0%

FCF / Net income

19.67x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.3M · net income $8.3M · FCF $162.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

35.1%— pts

Operating margin

-130.3%— pts

Net margin

88.9%— pts

FCF margin

1749.0%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$9.3M$9.3M———
Net Income$8.3M$8.3M$3.0M$-136.9M$-23.7M
EBITDA$9.6M$9.6M$9.4M$-133.9M$-23.5M
EPS0.010.010.01-0.28-0.05
Gross Margin35.1%35.1%———
Operating Margin-130.3%-130.3%———
Net Margin88.9%88.9%———
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio6.336.33———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$162.5M$162.5M$-87.2M$-125.3M$2.5M
Returns
ROE0.7%0.7%0.3%-15.8%-2.4%
Valuation
P/E147.00147.00124.50——
EV/EBITDA49.8449.84-4.14——
P/B0.680.680.700.730.88
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth0.0%0.0%103.6%-460.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

135.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.13

Spread vs growth

-135.4%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

73.6%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.16

Spread vs growth

-73.6%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

38.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.25

Spread vs growth

-38.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +10.9%

Total return

+10.9%

Start / end P/E

132.5x → 147.0x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

+0.0%

EPS growth+0.0%
Multiple rerating+10.9%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.