StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SANGAMFIN.BO$38.22-7.35%
Fair $38.22+0.0%

SANGAMFIN.BO

Sangam Finserv Limited

Financial Services / Credit ServicesBSE

$38.22

-3.03 (-7.35%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $38.22Fund rank 36/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 3/9
Declining RevenueLow Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 21.0/100

Data gap 36/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 77/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years ROE is 2.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SANGAMFIN.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Sangam Finserv Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.8B

P/E

58.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.4%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.40

↑
52-Week Range$38
$26$50

TradingView lightweight chart

SANGAMFIN.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $38.22Periodo +778.6%
Fair value: $38.22

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.6%

FCF CAGR

-9.5%

FCF margin

122.9%

FCF / Net income

4.64x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $123.0M · net income $32.6M · FCF $151.2M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

26.5%-25.0% pts

FCF margin

122.9%-40.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$123.0M$123.0M$146.2M$150.4M$125.2M
Net Income$32.6M$32.6M$66.0M$79.0M$64.4M
EPS——1.421.701.38
Net Margin26.5%26.5%45.1%52.5%51.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.400.400.200.210.28
Current Ratio123.64123.64———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$151.2M$151.2M$287.9M$103.1M$204.0M
Returns
ROE2.4%2.4%5.0%6.2%5.4%
Valuation
P/E58.8058.8032.8212.356.04
P/B1.311.311.630.770.33
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-15.9%-15.9%-2.8%20.2%—
EPS Growth——-16.5%23.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -6.7%

Total return

-6.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.42 → n/d

Residual

-6.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-6.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.