StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SEYAIND.NS$15.00+1.28%
Fair $15.00+0.0%

SEYAIND.NS

Seya Industries Limited

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsNSE

$15.00

+0.19 (+1.28%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $15.00Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-127.7M · quality 45.3/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -0.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SEYAIND.NSLocal privado en este navegador · Seya Industries Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$448M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

83.3x

↑

ROE

-0.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.94

↑
52-Week Range$15
$9$24

TradingView lightweight chart

SEYAIND.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $15.00Periodo -96.7%
Fair value: $15.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

2.71x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-63.1M · FCF $-170.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$80.6M$371.1M$656.5M
Net Income$-63.1M$-63.1M$-34.7M$-246.8M$-62.8M
EBITDA$97.5M$97.5M$128.0M$-81.7M$105.8M
EPS-2.37-2.37-1.31-9.29-2.36
Gross Margin——100.0%7.3%55.1%
Operating Margin——-176.6%-94.6%-13.1%
Net Margin——-43.1%-66.5%-9.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.940.940.930.930.90
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-170.9M$-170.9M$-104.9M$-127.7M$121.3M
Returns
ROE-0.8%-0.8%-0.4%-3.0%-0.7%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA83.2583.2565.19—82.88
P/B0.050.050.080.060.13
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-78.3%-43.5%—
EPS Growth-80.9%-80.9%85.9%-293.6%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -5.1%

Total return

-5.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-1.31 → -2.37

Residual

-5.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-5.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.