StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SHIVACEM.BO$16.74-0.52%
Fair $16.74+0.0%

SHIVACEM.BO

Shiva Cement Limited

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsBSE

$16.74

-0.09 (-0.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $16.74Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 22%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.5B · quality 62.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · SHIVACEM.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Shiva Cement Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.9B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

128.0x

↑

ROE

571.8%

↑

Gross Margin

72.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

-77.23

↓
52-Week Range$17
$12$43

TradingView lightweight chart

SHIVACEM.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $17.24Periodo -56.4%
Fair value: $16.74

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-34.7%

FCF / Net income

1.20x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.35B · net income $-1.26B · FCF $-1.51B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

72.1%— pts

Operating margin

-6.5%— pts

Net margin

-28.8%— pts

FCF margin

-34.7%— pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$4.35B$4.35B$3.11B$3.47B—
Net Income$-1.26B$-1.26B$-1.42B$-683.2M$-804.7M
EBITDA$170.9M$170.9M$-46.2M$346.6M$-368.1M
EPS——-4.87-3.27-3.85
Gross Margin72.1%72.1%73.6%77.0%—
Operating Margin-6.5%-6.5%-15.5%2.7%—
Net Margin-28.8%-28.8%-45.8%-19.7%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-77.23-77.2313.01-9.26-15.71
Current Ratio0.280.28———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.51B$-1.51B$-2.68B$-14.7M$-4.59B
Returns
ROE571.8%571.8%-137.8%46.6%102.7%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA127.97127.97———
P/B——8.85——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth39.8%39.8%-10.3%——
EPS Growth——-49.1%15.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -43.2%

Total return

-43.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-4.87 → n/d

Residual

-43.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-43.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.