StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SIKKO.NS$4.08+0.49%
Fair $4.08+0.0%

SIKKO.NS

Sikko Industries Limited

Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsNSE

$4.08

+0.02 (+0.49%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.08Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 43/C
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-96.5M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 3/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

43/100

C

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · SIKKO.NSLocal privado en este navegador · Sikko Industries Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.8B

P/E

34.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

24.5x

↑

ROE

5.9%

↑

Gross Margin

35.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.14

↓
52-Week Range$4
$3$7

TradingView lightweight chart

SIKKO.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.080Periodo +534.4%
Fair value: $4.080

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+9.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-14.8%

FCF / Net income

-1.89x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $650.1M · net income $51.0M · FCF $-96.5M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

35.2%+6.2% pts

Operating margin

8.8%+0.3% pts

Net margin

7.9%+2.0% pts

FCF margin

-14.8%-2.5% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$650.1M$650.1M$617.5M$612.9M$496.7M
Net Income$51.0M$51.0M$42.7M$40.6M$28.9M
EBITDA$77.5M$77.5M$71.0M$75.4M$50.9M
EPS——0.100.120.09
Gross Margin35.2%35.2%32.9%24.3%29.1%
Operating Margin8.8%8.8%9.2%5.6%8.5%
Net Margin7.9%7.9%6.9%6.6%5.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.140.140.050.210.36
Current Ratio3.443.44———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-96.5M$-96.5M$-445.9M$12.7M$-61.5M
Returns
ROE5.9%5.9%5.2%14.6%12.1%
Valuation
P/E34.0034.0037.5532.1649.85
EV/EBITDA24.4724.4723.1518.1129.96
P/B2.072.071.974.696.06
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.3%5.3%0.8%23.4%—
EPS Growth——-17.4%42.2%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +6.1%

Total return

+6.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.10 → n/d

Residual

+6.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+6.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.