StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SITAENT.BO$151.90+4.33%
Fair $151.90+0.0%

SITAENT.BO

Sita Enterprises Limited

Financial Services / Credit ServicesBSE

$151.90

+6.30 (+4.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $151.90Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 25.0/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 18/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · SITAENT.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Sita Enterprises Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$456M

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

36.5x

↑

ROE

7.3%

↑

Gross Margin

95.2%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$152
$122$221

TradingView lightweight chart

SITAENT.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $151.90Periodo +31.2%
Fair value: $151.90

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+40.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-17.4%

FCF / Net income

-0.43x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $27.8M · net income $11.2M · FCF $-4.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

95.2%+2.7% pts

Operating margin

44.6%-45.7% pts

Net margin

40.4%-19.7% pts

FCF margin

-17.4%-150.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$27.8M$27.8M$15.8M$3.6M$10.0M
Net Income$11.2M$11.2M$28.2M$4.3M$6.0M
EBITDA$12.4M$12.4M$29.6M$5.3M$9.0M
EPS3.753.759.391.422.00
Gross Margin95.2%95.2%93.6%80.6%92.5%
Operating Margin44.6%44.6%187.2%146.6%90.3%
Net Margin40.4%40.4%178.3%118.0%60.2%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.8M$-4.8M$-2.1M$1.2M$13.2M
Returns
ROE7.3%7.3%19.6%3.7%5.4%
Valuation
P/E8.688.68———
EV/EBITDA36.5436.54———
P/B2.942.94———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth76.1%76.1%337.4%-63.7%—
EPS Growth-60.1%-60.1%561.3%-29.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

53.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$13.48

Spread vs growth

-113.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

34.2%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$16.31

Spread vs growth

-94.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

21.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$26.27

Spread vs growth

-81.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2.4%

Total return

+2.4%

Start / end P/E

15.8x → 40.5x

EPS bridge

9.39 → 3.75

Residual

-93.9%

EPS growth-60.1%
Multiple rerating+156.3%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-93.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.