StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SKBNK.IS$12.84+0.00%
Fair $12.84+0.0%

SKBNK.IS

Sekerbank T.A.S.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalIstanbul

$12.84

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $12.84Fund rank 22/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 1/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 90.0/100

Data gap 22/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 24/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 2.26, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · SKBNK.ISLocal privado en este navegador · Sekerbank T.A.S.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$32.1B

P/E

11.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

13.9%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

2.26

↑
52-Week Range$13
$4$15

TradingView lightweight chart

SKBNK.IS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $13.17Periodo +2845.4%
Fair value: $12.84

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+35.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-4.3%

FCF / Net income

-0.26x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $16.19B · net income $2.70B · FCF $-688.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

16.7%-11.4% pts

FCF margin

-4.3%-3.7% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$16.19B$16.19B$12.03B$9.54B$6.57B
Net Income$2.70B$2.70B$2.90B$2.97B$1.85B
EPS1.141.141.491.710.85
Net Margin16.7%16.7%24.1%31.1%28.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity2.262.261.511.361.42
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-688.5M$-688.5M$5.92B$3.37B$-36.8M
Returns
ROE13.9%13.9%18.1%26.7%30.1%
Valuation
P/E11.0711.073.312.463.37
P/B1.571.570.600.651.02
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth34.6%34.6%26.1%45.1%—
EPS Growth-23.3%-23.3%-13.0%102.2%—
Dividend Yield0.5%0.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-0.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.14

Spread vs growth

-23.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

3.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$1.38

Spread vs growth

-27.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

6.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$2.22

Spread vs growth

-30.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +192.5%

Total return

+192.5%

Start / end P/E

3.0x → 11.5x

EPS bridge

1.49 → 1.14

Residual

-65.6%

EPS growth-23.3%
Multiple rerating+280.9%
Dividend+0.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-65.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.