StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SOGN.OL$327.60+0.64%
Fair $327.60+0.0%

SOGN.OL

Sogn Sparebank

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalOslo

$327.60

+2.10 (+0.64%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $327.60Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 7/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 33.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 82/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

7/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 5.23, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · SOGN.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Sogn Sparebank
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$207M

P/E

15.1x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

8.6%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

5.23

↑
52-Week Range$328
$247$380

TradingView lightweight chart

SOGN.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $330.00Periodo +200.0%
Fair value: $327.60

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+11.4%

FCF CAGR

+3.3%

FCF margin

67.5%

FCF / Net income

1.54x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $257.2M · net income $113.1M · FCF $173.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

44.0%+7.8% pts

FCF margin

67.5%-17.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$257.2M$257.2M$246.6M$231.9M$186.0M
Net Income$113.1M$113.1M$103.8M$85.2M$67.3M
EPS22.6222.6221.8118.0914.36
Net Margin44.0%44.0%42.1%36.7%36.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity5.235.235.805.915.59
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$173.6M$173.6M$99.6M$73.6M$157.3M
Returns
ROE8.6%8.6%8.8%7.8%6.3%
Valuation
P/E15.0615.0611.378.969.96
P/B0.160.160.130.090.08
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.3%4.3%6.4%24.7%—
EPS Growth3.7%3.7%20.6%26.0%—
Dividend Yield6.7%6.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

8.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$29.07

Spread vs growth

-5.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

9.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$35.17

Spread vs growth

-5.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$56.65

Spread vs growth

-5.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +25.0%

Total return

+25.0%

Start / end P/E

12.8x → 14.6x

EPS bridge

21.81 → 22.62

Residual

+0.5%

EPS growth+3.7%
Multiple rerating+14.1%
Dividend+6.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.