StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SQG.V$0.10+0.00%
Fair $0.10+0.0%

SQG.V

Spackman Equities Group Inc.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementTSXV

$0.10

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.10Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 16/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 17.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

16/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -6.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SQG.VLocal privado en este navegador · Spackman Equities Group Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$25M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-6.3%

↓

Gross Margin

21.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.10

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$2

TradingView lightweight chart

SQG.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.100Periodo -98.0%
Fair value: $0.100

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.1%

FCF / Net income

0.70x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $7.8M · net income $-568389.0 · FCF $-395908.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

21.2%— pts

Operating margin

-12.1%— pts

Net margin

-7.3%— pts

FCF margin

-5.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$7.8M$7.8M$5.6M$14.1M—
Net Income$-568389.00$-568389.00$-2.8M$684141.00$-319383.29
EBITDA$-116415.00$-116415.00$-2.3M$1.4M$-272721.78
EPS——-0.01—-0.11
Gross Margin21.2%21.2%25.6%22.7%—
Operating Margin-12.1%-12.1%-47.7%5.8%—
Net Margin-7.3%-7.3%-49.1%4.8%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.100.100.060.34-1.39
Current Ratio1.371.37———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-395908.00$-395908.00$-3.0M$-1.1M$-113025.35
Returns
ROE-6.3%-6.3%-35.9%14.9%60.4%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA———28.98—
P/B2.832.83100.868.71—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth38.1%38.1%-60.0%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -95.0%

Total return

-95.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

-95.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-95.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.