StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SRES.L$0.02-4.55%
Fair $0.02+0.0%

SRES.L

Sunrise Resources plc

Basic Materials / Other Industrial Metals & MiningLSE

$0.02

-0.00 (-4.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.02Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-263845.00 · quality 68.7/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -18.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · SRES.LLocal privado en este navegador · Sunrise Resources plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-18.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.04

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

SRES.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.021Periodo -99.1%
Fair value: $0.021

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.77x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-342231.0 · FCF $-263845.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$112050.00——
Net Income$-342231.00$-342231.00$-658806.00$-391291.00$-478223.00
EBITDA$-367648.00$-367648.00$-310512.00$-424228.00$-291903.00
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00-0.00
Gross Margin——63.3%——
Operating Margin——-281.6%——
Net Margin——-588.0%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.040.040.110.130.00
Current Ratio0.720.72———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-263845.00$-263845.00$-253308.00$-466541.00$-416098.00
Returns
ROE-18.8%-18.8%-37.1%-16.9%-18.0%
Valuation
P/B64.7364.73117.87128.52154.67
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth60.0%60.0%-50.0%23.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +50.0%

Total return

+50.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → -0.00

Residual

+50.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+50.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.