StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
SRICC.BO$51.69+0.86%
Fair $51.69+0.0%

SRICC.BO

Sri Chakra Cement Limited

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsBSE

$51.69

+0.44 (+0.86%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $51.69Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $29.3M · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · SRICC.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Sri Chakra Cement Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$465M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

71.0%

↑

Gross Margin

70.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

-1.76

↓
52-Week Range$52
$23$99

TradingView lightweight chart

SRICC.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $51.69Periodo +675.4%
Fair value: $51.69

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-18.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

2.3%

FCF / Net income

-0.13x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.29B · net income $-230.9M · FCF $29.3M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

70.3%+40.7% pts

Operating margin

-28.2%-28.4% pts

Net margin

-18.0%-14.7% pts

FCF margin

2.3%+4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.29B$1.29B$1.07B$2.23B$2.37B
Net Income$-230.9M$-230.9M$-569.8M$-106.5M$-78.3M
EBITDA$-220.3M$-220.3M$-414.9M$37.2M$116.2M
EPS——-63.31-11.83-8.70
Gross Margin70.3%70.3%67.8%25.3%29.5%
Operating Margin-28.2%-28.2%-53.4%-3.5%0.2%
Net Margin-18.0%-18.0%-53.0%-4.8%-3.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-1.76-1.76-5.580.971.36
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$29.3M$29.3M$-167.3M$546.0M$-39.7M
Returns
ROE71.0%71.0%502.3%-23.4%-13.9%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA———12.926.93
P/B———0.130.11
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth19.6%19.6%-51.9%-5.8%—
EPS Growth——-435.2%-36.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +129.4%

Total return

+129.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-63.31 → n/d

Residual

+129.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+129.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.