StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
STRK-M.TA$1950.00+14.71%
Fair $1950.00+0.0%

STRK-M.TA

Stark Power Ltd

Financial Services / Shell CompaniesTel Aviv

$1950.00

+250.00 (+14.71%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1950.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 43/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -27.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · STRK-M.TALocal privado en este navegador · Stark Power Ltd
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$97M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-27.2%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$1950
$0$2550

TradingView lightweight chart

STRK-M.TA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,950Periodo +404.9%
Fair value: $1,950

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.81x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-1.0M · FCF $-809000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue——$3.9M$11.2M$14.8M
Net Income$-1.0M$-1.0M$-60.1M$-50.3M$-75.7M
EBITDA$-1.0M$-1.0M$-59.1M$-31.2M$-70.9M
EPS——-12.16-10.23-15.51
Gross Margin——38.2%-75.5%17.7%
Operating Margin——-234.3%-518.1%-421.5%
Net Margin——-1560.0%-450.8%-510.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.020.02
Current Ratio6.046.04———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-809000.00$-809000.00$-11.3M$-48.6M$-81.2M
Returns
ROE-27.2%-27.2%-1283.6%-22.6%-28.6%
Valuation
P/B2619.872619.870.093.9748.24
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth——-65.5%-24.8%—
EPS Growth——-18.9%34.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +2241279.4%

Total return

+2241279.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-12.16 → n/d

Residual

+2241279.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2241279.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.