StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TINDE.OL$114.50-0.42%
Fair $114.50+0.0%

TINDE.OL

Tinde Sparebank

Financial Services / Financial ConglomeratesOslo

$114.50

-0.48 (-0.42%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $114.50Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 23/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 28.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

23/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · TINDE.OLLocal privado en este navegador · Tinde Sparebank
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$624M

P/E

32.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.9%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.31

↑
52-Week Range$115
$101$130

TradingView lightweight chart

TINDE.OL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $114.50Periodo +7.5%
Fair value: $114.50

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+26.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-129.2%

FCF / Net income

-5.84x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $376.3M · net income $83.3M · FCF $-486.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

22.1%-10.1% pts

FCF margin

-129.2%-123.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$376.3M$376.3M$248.7M$222.8M$188.0M
Net Income$83.3M$83.3M$79.8M$68.1M$60.5M
EPS4.904.909.199.208.83
Net Margin22.1%22.1%32.1%30.6%32.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.311.311.181.361.17
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-486.4M$-486.4M$56.0M$-209.4M$-10.0M
Returns
ROE3.9%3.9%7.4%7.2%6.8%
Valuation
P/E32.5332.5313.6512.9314.69
P/B0.290.290.320.250.29
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth51.3%51.3%11.6%18.5%—
EPS Growth-46.7%-46.7%-0.1%4.2%—
Dividend Yield4.3%4.3%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

27.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$10.16

Spread vs growth

-74.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

20.2%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$12.29

Spread vs growth

-66.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

15.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$19.80

Spread vs growth

-61.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -5.6%

Total return

-5.6%

Start / end P/E

13.8x → 23.4x

EPS bridge

9.19 → 4.90

Residual

-32.3%

EPS growth-46.7%
Multiple rerating+69.1%
Dividend+4.3%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-32.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.