StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
TKBP.SW$184.00+0.00%
Fair $184.00+0.0%

TKBP.SW

Thurgauer Kantonalbank

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalSwiss

$184.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $184.00Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 6/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 38.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 5.82, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · TKBP.SWLocal privado en este navegador · Thurgauer Kantonalbank
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$736M

P/E

22.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

9.2%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

5.82

↑
52-Week Range$184
$148$194

TradingView lightweight chart

TKBP.SW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $184.00Periodo +130.0%
Fair value: $184.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+5.4%

FCF CAGR

-54.0%

FCF margin

36.4%

FCF / Net income

1.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $445.9M · net income $162.3M · FCF $162.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

36.4%-2.5% pts

FCF margin

36.4%-403.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$445.9M$445.9M$431.8M$438.5M$380.5M
Net Income$162.3M$162.3M$158.0M$158.9M$147.8M
EPS8.118.117.907.957.39
Net Margin36.4%36.4%36.6%36.2%38.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity5.825.825.745.645.54
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$162.4M$162.4M$1.21B$-1.10B$1.67B
Returns
ROE9.2%9.2%9.4%9.9%9.7%
Valuation
P/E22.6922.6916.4614.9115.70
P/B0.420.420.310.300.31
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth3.3%3.3%-1.5%15.3%—
EPS Growth2.7%2.7%-0.6%7.6%—
Dividend Yield2.0%2.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

26.3%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$16.33

Spread vs growth

-23.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

19.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$19.76

Spread vs growth

-16.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

14.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$31.82

Spread vs growth

-12.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +21.1%

Total return

+21.1%

Start / end P/E

19.6x → 22.7x

EPS bridge

7.90 → 8.11

Residual

+0.4%

EPS growth+2.7%
Multiple rerating+16.0%
Dividend+2.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.