StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WARBABANK.KW$277.00+0.00%
Fair $277.00+0.0%

WARBABANK.KW

Warba Bank K.S.C.P.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalKuwait

$277.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $277.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 20.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 35/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · WARBABANK.KWLocal privado en este navegador · Warba Bank K.S.C.P.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.3B

P/E

27.7x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

5.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.16

↓
52-Week Range$277
$211$306

TradingView lightweight chart

WARBABANK.KW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $278.00Periodo +54.2%
Fair value: $277.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+15.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-455.7%

FCF / Net income

-8.80x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $95.9M · net income $49.6M · FCF $-436.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

51.8%+20.6% pts

FCF margin

-455.7%-260.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$95.9M$95.9M$88.8M$64.1M$61.9M
Net Income$49.6M$49.6M$22.4M$19.7M$19.3M
EPS0.010.010.010.010.01
Net Margin51.8%51.8%25.2%30.7%31.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.160.160.750.780.81
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-436.9M$-436.9M$312.1M$270.9M$-121.0M
Returns
ROE5.1%5.1%5.4%5.0%5.2%
Valuation
P/E27.7027.7024463.5123585.0431323.93
P/B1143.771143.771148.031000.521235.56
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.0%8.0%38.4%3.6%—
EPS Growth56.2%56.2%4.3%12.5%—
Dividend Yield1.8%1.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

1210.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$24.58

Spread vs growth

-1154.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

386.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$29.74

Spread vs growth

-330.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

131.3%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$47.90

Spread vs growth

-75.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +22.9%

Total return

+22.9%

Start / end P/E

32845.3x → 25471.9x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

-12.6%

EPS growth+56.2%
Multiple rerating-22.4%
Dividend+1.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-12.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.