StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
WRLG.V$0.68+0.00%
Fair $0.68+0.0%

WRLG.V

West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.

Basic Materials / GoldTSXV

$0.68

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.68Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 17/F
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-26.3M · quality 51.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

17/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 0.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · WRLG.VLocal privado en este navegador · West Red Lake Gold Mines Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$281M

P/E

34.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

50.5x

↑

ROE

0.5%

↑

Gross Margin

43.7%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.27

↑
52-Week Range$1
$1$1

TradingView lightweight chart

WRLG.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.680Periodo +385.7%
Fair value: $0.680

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-68.3%

FCF / Net income

-140.91x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $103.4M · net income $501000.0 · FCF $-70.6M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

43.7%— pts

Operating margin

22.6%— pts

Net margin

0.5%— pts

FCF margin

-68.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$103.4M$103.4M———
Net Income$501000.00$501000.00$-32.5M$-192309.00$-177279.00
EBITDA$7.0M$7.0M$-32.3M$-192309.00$-203878.00
EPS——-0.30-0.01-0.01
Gross Margin43.7%43.7%———
Operating Margin22.6%22.6%———
Net Margin0.5%0.5%———
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.271.270.12——
Current Ratio1.051.05———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-70.6M$-70.6M$-26.3M$-203086.00$-196194.00
Returns
ROE0.5%0.5%-49.2%-10.8%-9.0%
Valuation
P/E34.0034.00———
EV/EBITDA50.5350.53———
P/B2.812.811.124.160.64
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——-2900.0%0.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -27.7%

Total return

-27.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.30 → n/d

Residual

-27.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-27.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.