StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ZEST.MI$0.12-1.65%
Fair $0.12+0.0%

ZEST.MI

Zest S.p.A.

Financial Services / Asset ManagementMilan

$0.12

-0.00 (-1.65%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.12Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 31/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 1unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -2.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ZEST.MILocal privado en este navegador · Zest S.p.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$24M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

167.3x

↑

ROE

-2.5%

↓

Gross Margin

55.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.16

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

ZEST.MI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.119Periodo -97.4%
Fair value: $0.120

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-20.3%

FCF / Net income

1.47x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.4M · net income $-1.2M · FCF $-1.7M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

55.3%— pts

Operating margin

0.8%— pts

Net margin

-13.8%— pts

FCF margin

-20.3%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$8.4M$8.4M$5.8M$5.0M$5.2M—
Net Income$-1.2M$-1.2M$7.6M$-3.2M$-2.7M—
EBITDA$172082.00$172082.00$9.1M$-1.0M$-2.2M—
EPS-0.01-0.010.05-0.06-0.05—
Gross Margin55.3%55.3%28.7%64.4%55.3%—
Operating Margin0.8%0.8%-41.1%-55.5%-47.1%—
Net Margin-13.8%-13.8%131.7%-62.9%-51.3%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.160.16—0.150.140.22
Current Ratio0.610.61————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.7M$-1.7M—$-182549.00$-997023.00$-1.9M
Returns
ROE-2.5%-2.5%—-9.4%-6.9%—
Valuation
P/E——3.53———
EV/EBITDA167.31167.312.97———
P/B0.520.52—0.450.49—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth45.1%45.1%15.2%-3.2%——
EPS Growth-112.5%-112.5%182.1%-13.8%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -30.4%

Total return

-30.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.05 → -0.01

Residual

-30.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-30.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.